I want to do research, where do I start ?

Presented by Chris Oldmeadow

Date: 11th March 2024

Presentation Overview

  • Developing a Research Question

  • Key Components of Effective Research Questions

  • Applying Frameworks to Construct Research Questions

  • From Questions to Objectives

  • Population Selection and Eligibility Criteria

  • Understanding Clinical Trial Endpoints

  • Significance of Sample Size and Power in Research

“Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought.”
- Albert Szent-Györgyi

A well-formulated question is the first step in thinking differently about what we observe

Developing a Research Question

  • Identify a gap: reviewing literature, attending conferences, and engaging with the community.
  • Formulate the question: frameworks like PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) and FINER (Feasible, Intersting, Novel, Ethical , Relvent ).
  • Statistical considerations from the start — feasibility of study design, data collection methods, and preliminary data analysis plans.

Crafting Research Questions

  • Research question: A clearly defined query that your research aims to answer. It guides the focus of your study and is the starting point of your research.
  • A well-crafted research question should be specific , feasible, and relevant, addressing gaps in the current knowledge.

Example

  • Bad: Is the new radiotherapy technique beneficial for lung cancer patients?

  • Better: Investigating the efficacy of high-precision, image-guided radiotherapy (Intervention) in extending survival (Outcome) among patients with advanced lung cancer (Population) compared to the current standard of care (Comparator) over a two-year period (Time).

The importance of Systematic Review

  • Foundation for research: lays the groundwork by compiling and analysing all relevant studies on a topic.
  • Identifying gaps: uncovering research gaps, which directly informs the development of research objectives.
  • Refining research questions: insights from a systematic review can lead to refining the question for clarity and focus

More considerations for good research questions

  • What is the appropriate stage for evaluation?
  • Can internal validity be achieved?
  • To what extent is external validity (generalisability) achievable?
  • What will your circumstances permit?
  • What can you afford?
  • What is the best balance between “idea” and “feasibility”?

Setting Research Objectives

  • Research objectives: Breakdown the research question into smaller, manageable goals.

  • Defined using SMART criteria: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Time-defined.

  • Aim for clarity and specificity to guide your research direction effectively.

Example Research Objectives

  • Primary objective:
    • To determine the difference in two-year overall survival rates between stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with high-precision, image-guided radiotherapy versus those treated with conventional conformal radiotherapy.
  • Secondary objective:
    • To assess the impact of high-precision, image-guided radiotherapy on the quality of life of stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients at 12 months post randomisation, compared to the impact of conventional conformal radiotherapy.

Population Selection & Eligibility

  • Trial phase impact
    • Early phases: Homogeneous populations for focused insights.
    • Later phases: Heterogeneous populations for broader applicability.
  • Considerations
    • Safety is paramount.
    • Flexible entry criteria to ensure timely enrolment.

Clinical Trial Endpoints

  • Purpose & types
    • Guide trials: Primary (main outcome) and Secondary (supplementary insights).
    • Common types: Continuous, Categorical, Event-time.
  • Characteristics of primary endpoint
    • Clinically relevant, interpretable, sensitive, practical, and validated.
  • Considerations
    • Objective vs. Subjective: Importance of blinding.

Common endpoints in Cancer research

  • Overall survival: Gold standard primary
  • Complete response/ Objective response rate: A surrogate marker
  • Progression-free survival: A surrogate marker, common in phase 2 trials
  • Health related quality of life

Sample size/power

  • Sample size determination
    • Balances precision, feasibility, and resources.
    • Influenced by expected effect size, variability, and significance level (α).
  • Power (1-β)
    • Probability of detecting a true effect.
    • Aim for 80-90% power: Minimises risk of Type II error (failing to detect a real effect).
  • Impact on clinical trials
    • Adequate sample size and power ensure reliable, generalisable results.

Summary

  • Start with an idea
  • Use frameworks to get a research question
  • Revise this question with literature review
  • Start to consider populations and outcomes
  • Talk to a statistician as soon as possible